Applications in Dynatrace should be defined based on what criterion?

Defining applications in Dynatrace based on team ownership is significant because it aligns the monitoring and performance management with the structure and responsibilities of the development teams. Each team typically has specific applications that it owns, allowing for clearer accountability and better insights into the performance, availability, and user experience of the applications they manage. This approach facilitates targeted troubleshooting and optimization efforts and ensures that the team closely monitors the applications that fall under their purview.

When applications are defined by team ownership, it becomes easier to correlate changes in application performance with deployments made by the specific team. This fosters a DevOps culture, where collaboration between development and operations is enhanced by focused ownership and accountability. As a result, teams can quickly respond to issues, improve deployment strategies, and enhance the overall quality of their applications.

In contrast, defining applications based on geographical location, application size, or development phase does not necessarily promote the same level of ownership and accountability among teams. Those criteria may introduce complexity in management and monitoring, making it harder to track performance in relation to team-based operational practices. By prioritizing team ownership, organizations can achieve a more effective and responsive approach to application monitoring and management within Dynatrace.